Two lightweight handheld sweepers battle for budget-conscious cleaning. One offers extended runtime, the other prioritizes quiet operation. Discover which cordless cleaner deserves your money.
| Specification | BLACK+DECKER Carpet Sweeper 50 Minute Lithium | Shark Rechargeable Floor Sweeper🏆 Winner 🏆 |
|---|---|---|
| Bin Capacity | 0.5 liters | 0.5 liters |
| Noise Level | — | 75 dB |
| Weight | 3.5 lbs | 3.5 lbs |
| Self Emptying | No | No |
| Product | BLACK+DECKER Carpet Sweeper 50 Minute Lithium Floor Sweeper, Multi-Surface Use, Easy One Hand Cleaning, Self Standing, Charger Included (HFS115J10) | — |
| Manufacturer | BLACK+DECKER | Shark |
| Series Model | HFS115J10 | V2700Z |
| Battery Type | Lithium-ion | Lithium-ion |
| Battery Life Min | 50 | 20 |
| Charging Time Min | 180 | 180 |
| Spot Cleaning | Yes | Yes |
| Standard Mode | Yes | Yes |
| Mopping | No | No |
| Scheduling | No | No |
| App Control | No | No |
| Dirt Detect | No | No |
| Hepa Filter | No | No |
| Voice Control | ||
| Wifi Connected | No | No |
| Anti Tangle Brush | Yes | Yes |
| Obstacle Avoidance | No | No |
| Tile | Yes | Yes |
| Vinyl | Yes | Yes |
| Hardwood | Yes | Yes |
| Laminate | Yes | Yes |
| Pet Hair | Yes | Yes |
| Allergens | No | No |
| Fine Dust | Yes | Yes |
| Large Debris | Yes | Yes |
| Carpet Low Pile | Yes | Yes |
| Carpet High Pile | No | No |
| Carpet Medium Pile | Yes | No |
| In The Box | — | |
| Filter Type | — | Washable foam filter |
| Auto Recharge | — | No |
| Resume Cleaning | — | No |
| Edge Cleaning | — | Yes |
Shark Rechargeable Floor Sweeper
Our top pick for this comparison
The BLACK+DECKER Carpet Sweeper 50 Minute Lithium and Shark Rechargeable Floor Sweeper represent two distinct approaches to affordable cordless cleaning. Both are handheld units designed for quick cleanups and spot cleaning rather than whole-home deep cleaning. The BLACK+DECKER emphasizes extended runtime with its 50-minute battery life, positioning itself as the choice for users who need longer uninterrupted cleaning sessions. The Shark, meanwhile, prioritizes quiet operation at 75 dB and washable filters that reduce long-term maintenance costs. Both units weigh an identical 3.5 lbs, making portability a wash between the two competitors. The price difference is notable, with the Shark coming in at $43.88 compared to the BLACK+DECKER's $54.99, offering a $11 savings for budget-conscious shoppers. These are complementary cleaning tools rather than primary vacuum solutions, ideal for maintaining clean floors between deep cleaning sessions or for apartment dwellers with limited storage space.
Understanding the target user for each product is crucial when making a decision. The BLACK+DECKER appeals to homeowners who prioritize runtime and are willing to pay a premium for extended cleaning capability without recharging interruptions. The Shark targets noise-sensitive users and those who prefer quieter operation, particularly in shared living spaces or homes with sleeping family members. Neither vacuum boasts smart features, app connectivity, or advanced navigation technology, keeping both products simple and straightforward. The lack of Wi-Fi connectivity means users cannot schedule cleaning or monitor performance remotely, but this also means no subscription fees or software complications. For consumers seeking uncomplicated, affordable cordless cleaning solutions without bells and whistles, both products deliver solid value propositions in their respective niches.
The rating difference between the two units is minimal but telling. The Shark edges out the BLACK+DECKER with a 7.8/10 rating compared to 7.5/10, suggesting slightly higher customer satisfaction. This modest difference likely reflects the Shark's quiet operation and washable filter system, which users appreciate for long-term value. However, the BLACK+DECKER's longer runtime appeals to a different user segment that values extended cleaning sessions over noise reduction. Both products occupy the same handheld category and serve similar purposes, but their distinct strengths appeal to different household needs and priorities.
The BLACK+DECKER Carpet Sweeper delivers effective cleaning on low to medium pile carpets and hard floors, making it suitable for maintenance cleaning rather than deep carpet extraction. Its consistent power delivery throughout the 50-minute battery life ensures that cleaning performance doesn't degrade as the battery depletes. Users report solid pickup of surface debris, dust, and light pet hair from everyday use. The sweeper struggles with high-pile carpets and deeply embedded pet hair, which is a limitation acknowledged in its design specifications. For apartment dwellers with primarily hard flooring and low-pile carpets, the BLACK+DECKER provides reliable performance that meets everyday cleaning expectations.
The Shark Rechargeable Floor Sweeper demonstrates effective suction power for picking up pet hair and fine dust particles, making it particularly valuable for pet-owning households. Its edge-cleaning design reaches baseboards and corners effectively, addressing areas that round-headed vacuums often miss. The Shark's washable filter system maintains consistent suction performance across multiple cleaning sessions without filter degradation. However, the Shark's 20-minute runtime means users must strategically plan cleaning sessions, particularly in larger homes. The shorter runtime combined with smaller dustbin capacity requires more frequent breaks and emptying, which can interrupt cleaning flow for extended sessions.
When comparing real-world performance, the BLACK+DECKER's longer runtime provides a significant advantage for comprehensive cleaning sessions. Users can complete an entire apartment or small home on a single charge without needing to recharge mid-session. The Shark requires strategic planning and multiple charging cycles for larger homes, though its quiet operation makes frequent recharging less burdensome in noise-sensitive environments. Neither vacuum achieves the deep cleaning power of full-size upright models, but both excel at maintenance cleaning and quick pickups. For pet owners specifically, the Shark's effectiveness on pet hair gives it a slight edge in real-world performance, despite its shorter runtime.
The BLACK+DECKER's 50-minute lithium-ion battery runtime is a substantial advantage for users with larger homes or those seeking extended cleaning sessions without interruption. This runtime allows complete cleaning of a 1,500-2,000 square foot apartment or house without needing to recharge. The quick charging capability ensures that if recharging is necessary, users aren't waiting excessively between sessions. The consistent power delivery throughout the battery life means that cleaning performance at minute 45 matches performance at minute 5, eliminating the gradual power loss common in older battery technologies. For users who value uninterrupted cleaning sessions and dislike frequent charging interruptions, the BLACK+DECKER delivers exceptional practical value.
The Shark's 20-minute runtime is considerably shorter, which significantly impacts practical usability in larger homes. This runtime is adequate for apartment cleaning or spot cleaning in houses, but necessitates strategic planning for comprehensive home cleaning. The 3-4 hour charging time between uses means users cannot quickly recharge and resume cleaning if they exceed the 20-minute window. However, the shorter runtime suits users with smaller living spaces or those who prefer multiple quick cleaning sessions throughout the day over one extended session. The Shark's runtime is sufficient for daily maintenance cleaning but inadequate for deep cleaning an entire large home in one session.
For practical home size considerations, the BLACK+DECKER suits homes up to 2,500 square feet, while the Shark is better suited for apartments and smaller homes under 1,500 square feet. Users in larger homes choosing the Shark must accept multiple charging cycles as part of their cleaning routine. The BLACK+DECKER's superior runtime eliminates this inconvenience, making it the better choice for users who value efficiency and uninterrupted cleaning sessions. Neither unit matches the runtime of full-size cordless stick vacuums, but the BLACK+DECKER significantly outperforms the Shark in this critical category.
Both the BLACK+DECKER and Shark weigh identical 3.5 lbs, making them equally portable and easy to maneuver during cleaning sessions. The handheld format allows users to reach ceiling corners, light fixtures, and furniture easily without bending or stretching. Stairs become manageable cleaning tasks with either handheld unit, unlike full-size vacuums that require awkward positioning. The compact design enables storage in closets, under sinks, or in apartment living spaces where full-size vacuums are impractical. However, the handheld format can cause arm fatigue during prolonged use, particularly for users with limited upper body strength or those with shoulder or arm conditions.
The BLACK+DECKER's easy dustbin emptying with a simple push-button mechanism simplifies maintenance and reduces the time between cleaning and resuming work. The dustbin capacity requires frequent emptying during extended sessions, which interrupts workflow but is a minor inconvenience given the simple emptying process. Switching between floor types is straightforward with either unit, though neither offers specialized brush roll adjustments for different surface types. The BLACK+DECKER's extended runtime reduces the frequency of dustbin emptying required during typical cleaning sessions compared to the Shark.
The Shark's lightweight design and portable format match the BLACK+DECKER's convenience, with the added benefit of quiet operation that allows cleaning without disturbing sleeping family members or neighbors. The washable filter system adds a maintenance element that some users find convenient while others view as an additional chore. The Shark's edge-cleaning design provides ergonomic advantages when cleaning along baseboards and in corners, reducing the need to bend or stretch awkwardly. Overall, both units offer excellent portability, with the BLACK+DECKER providing longer uninterrupted use and the Shark offering quieter operation and superior corner cleaning capability.
Neither the BLACK+DECKER nor the Shark offers Wi-Fi connectivity, app control, or smart mapping features, positioning both as straightforward, uncomplicated cleaning solutions. This absence of smart technology eliminates subscription fees, software updates, and the learning curve associated with app-based controls. Users seeking simple plug-and-play functionality will appreciate the lack of technological complexity. However, users accustomed to smart home integration and remote scheduling will find both units disappointing. The simplicity is both a strength and weakness depending on individual preferences and technological comfort levels.
The absence of app control means users cannot remotely start cleaning sessions or monitor battery levels from their smartphones. Smart mapping technology is absent from both units, requiring users to manually navigate their homes during cleaning. These limitations are acceptable for handheld spot-cleaning units but would be significant drawbacks in full-size robot or stick vacuums. The lack of smart features keeps both units affordable and accessible to users who prefer traditional cleaning approaches without technological intermediaries.
From a value perspective, the absence of smart features reduces long-term costs and eliminates potential software compatibility issues as operating systems and app ecosystems evolve. Users won't face obsolescence due to discontinued apps or incompatible software updates. This makes both units more durable investments in terms of functional lifespan, as they rely on mechanical components rather than digital infrastructure. For users prioritizing simplicity and reliability over technological sophistication, this absence of smart features is a significant advantage.
The Shark Rechargeable Floor Sweeper operates at 75 dB, which qualifies as quiet operation suitable for any time of day without disturbing others. This noise level is comparable to normal conversation and significantly quieter than traditional vacuum cleaners that typically range from 80-90 dB. Users can clean early mornings, late evenings, or during nap times without concern for noise disturbance. The BLACK+DECKER's noise level is not specified, but handheld sweepers typically operate in the 75-85 dB range. The unspecified noise level for the BLACK+DECKER is a notable omission that makes direct comparison impossible.
In shared living spaces, apartments, and homes with sleeping family members, the Shark's documented quiet operation provides significant practical value. Parents with young children or users in noise-sensitive environments will appreciate the ability to clean without waking sleeping household members. The quiet operation extends the practical cleaning hours available to users, allowing flexibility in scheduling cleaning sessions around family routines. This is a meaningful advantage for households where noise disturbance is a legitimate concern.
The BLACK+DECKER's unspecified noise level creates uncertainty about its suitability for quiet operation. Without this specification, users cannot confidently assess whether the BLACK+DECKER is appropriate for their noise-sensitive environment. The Shark's transparency about noise levels demonstrates user-centric product design and allows informed decision-making. For users prioritizing quiet operation, the Shark's documented 75 dB rating provides confidence and peace of mind that the BLACK+DECKER's missing specification cannot match.
Both units feature dustbins that require frequent emptying during extended cleaning sessions due to limited capacity. The BLACK+DECKER's simple push-button dustbin emptying mechanism simplifies the process and reduces contact with collected debris. The straightforward design minimizes maintenance requirements and reduces the likelihood of mechanical failure in the bin system. However, frequent emptying interrupts cleaning workflow and requires multiple trips to trash receptacles during extended sessions. The dustbin capacity is the limiting factor for both units when cleaning larger areas.
The Shark's washable filter system represents a significant long-term value advantage over traditional disposable filters. Users can rinse the filter under running water and reuse it indefinitely, eliminating the ongoing cost of replacement filters. This washable system reduces maintenance expenses over the product's lifetime and appeals to environmentally conscious users seeking to minimize waste. The filter maintenance adds a minor chore to the cleaning routine but is offset by substantial long-term savings. The washable filter system demonstrates Shark's commitment to user value and sustainability.
The BLACK+DECKER's filter specifications are not detailed, but handheld sweepers typically use disposable or cartridge-style filters requiring periodic replacement. These replacement filters represent ongoing maintenance costs that accumulate over years of use. For users planning long-term ownership, the Shark's washable filter system provides superior value and lower total cost of ownership. The maintenance difference between the two units favors the Shark, particularly for users who plan extended product ownership and want to minimize long-term expenses.
The product descriptions do not specify what accessories or extras are included with either unit, which is a notable omission in the comparison. Typically, handheld vacuums include crevice tools, brush attachments, and extension wands that expand cleaning versatility. The BLACK+DECKER and Shark may include different accessory packages that affect overall value and functionality. Without this information, potential buyers cannot fully assess the complete package and must rely on manufacturer specifications or customer reviews to determine included accessories.
Accessories significantly impact practical usability by enabling cleaning in tight spaces, upholstery cleaning, and hard-to-reach areas. The absence of this information in the product specifications makes it impossible to provide a definitive comparison regarding included extras. Buyers should verify accessory inclusions directly with manufacturers or retailers before purchasing. The lack of transparent accessory information is a weakness in the product documentation for both units.
When evaluating total value, the included accessories can justify price differences between competing products. A unit priced slightly higher but including comprehensive accessory packages may provide superior overall value compared to a cheaper unit with minimal accessories. Potential buyers should prioritize researching accessory inclusions when making final purchasing decisions, as this information significantly impacts real-world functionality and value proposition.
The BLACK+DECKER Carpet Sweeper 50 Minute Lithium is priced at $54.99, positioning it as a premium handheld option within the budget cordless cleaner category. This price point reflects the extended 50-minute runtime and consistent power delivery throughout the battery life. For users who value extended cleaning sessions without recharging interruptions, the $54.99 price represents reasonable value. The price is substantially higher than basic handheld sweepers but considerably lower than full-size cordless stick vacuums. The pricing strategy targets users willing to invest moderately for extended runtime capability.
The Shark Rechargeable Floor Sweeper is priced at $43.88, offering an $11 savings compared to the BLACK+DECKER. This $11 difference represents approximately 20% savings, which is significant for budget-conscious shoppers. The lower price point reflects the shorter 20-minute runtime and smaller dustbin capacity. For users with smaller living spaces or those who don't mind multiple charging cycles, the Shark's lower price delivers excellent value. The washable filter system adds long-term value by eliminating ongoing filter replacement costs, effectively reducing the total cost of ownership over years of use.
Long-term value analysis favors the Shark due to the washable filter system that eliminates replacement filter expenses. Over a five-year ownership period, the Shark's filter savings could exceed $50-100 depending on filter replacement frequency and costs. This long-term savings advantage partially or completely offsets the BLACK+DECKER's higher upfront price for users planning extended product ownership. However, the BLACK+DECKER's superior runtime provides value for users who prioritize uninterrupted cleaning sessions and are willing to pay a premium for that capability.
Warranty information is not provided for either unit, which is a significant omission affecting long-term value assessment. Manufacturer warranties typically range from one to three years for handheld vacuums, with longer warranties indicating manufacturer confidence in product durability. Without warranty information, buyers cannot fully assess long-term protection and should verify warranty terms before purchasing. The lack of warranty specifications is a notable gap in the product documentation for both units.
For budget-conscious users seeking maximum value, the Shark's lower price and washable filter system provide superior long-term value despite the shorter runtime. For users with larger homes or those who prioritize extended cleaning sessions, the BLACK+DECKER's premium price is justified by the 50-minute runtime advantage. The choice depends on individual priorities regarding upfront cost, runtime requirements, and long-term maintenance expenses. Neither unit represents exceptional value compared to full-size cordless stick vacuums, but both offer reasonable pricing within the handheld sweeper category.
The Shark's documented effectiveness on pet hair makes it the superior choice for households with dogs or cats. Pet hair represents a significant cleaning challenge, and the Shark's suction power specifically addresses this need. The edge-cleaning design captures pet hair along baseboards and in corners where pets frequently shed. For pet owners, the Shark's specialized strength in pet hair removal justifies the shorter runtime, as pet-focused cleaning sessions are typically shorter and more targeted than whole-home cleaning.
Pet owners will appreciate the washable filter system that handles pet hair without clogging or reduced suction. The 20-minute runtime is adequate for daily pet hair maintenance, though pet owners with large homes may need multiple charging cycles. The Shark's quiet operation allows cleaning without disturbing pets that may be sensitive to vacuum noise. Overall, the Shark is purpose-built for pet-owning households and delivers superior performance in this specific use case.
The BLACK+DECKER's 50-minute runtime is essential for users with homes exceeding 2,000 square feet who want to complete cleaning without recharging interruptions. The extended runtime allows comprehensive cleaning of larger living spaces in a single session, improving efficiency and reducing overall cleaning time. Users with large homes will appreciate the ability to clean multiple rooms, hallways, and common areas without battery depletion concerns. The consistent power delivery ensures that cleaning performance remains strong throughout the extended session.
For large home owners, the BLACK+DECKER's premium price is justified by the runtime advantage that eliminates charging interruptions during comprehensive cleaning sessions. The 50-minute battery life accommodates homes up to 2,500 square feet, making the BLACK+DECKER the practical choice for spacious residences. Users with large homes should prioritize the BLACK+DECKER despite its higher price to avoid the frustration of battery depletion mid-cleaning session.
The Shark's washable filter system is advantageous for allergy sufferers who benefit from consistent air filtration without filter degradation. Disposable filters accumulate allergens and lose effectiveness over time, while washable filters can be thoroughly cleaned to restore filtration performance. The Shark's documented quiet operation reduces air disturbance that can stir up dust and allergens, providing a gentler cleaning experience. The edge-cleaning design captures dust and fine particles that accumulate along baseboards where allergen concentrations are often highest.
Allergy sufferers will appreciate the ability to clean filters without replacing them, reducing exposure to accumulated allergens during filter changes. The washable system allows more frequent filter cleaning, maintaining consistent air quality throughout the home. For allergy-prone households, the Shark's combination of washable filters and quiet operation makes it the superior choice despite the shorter runtime.
The Shark's $43.88 price point is $11 cheaper than the BLACK+DECKER, providing immediate savings for budget-conscious shoppers. The washable filter system eliminates ongoing filter replacement costs, reducing long-term expenses and total cost of ownership. For users with apartments or smaller homes where the 20-minute runtime is adequate, the Shark delivers excellent value without compromise. The lower price makes cordless cleaning accessible to budget-limited households that might otherwise skip handheld vacuums entirely.
Budget-conscious users who prioritize affordability over extended runtime will find the Shark's value proposition compelling. The combination of lower upfront cost and reduced long-term maintenance expenses makes the Shark the smart financial choice for price-sensitive buyers. Users willing to accept the shorter runtime in exchange for maximum savings should choose the Shark without hesitation.
Both the BLACK+DECKER and Shark lack smart features, app control, and Wi-Fi connectivity that appeal to technology enthusiasts. Neither unit offers remote scheduling, battery monitoring apps, or integration with smart home ecosystems. Tech enthusiasts seeking advanced features should consider full-size cordless stick vacuums from brands like Dyson or Samsung that offer app connectivity and smart mapping. The absence of technology in both handheld units makes neither appropriate for users prioritizing technological sophistication and smart home integration.
Winner: Shark Rechargeable Floor Sweeper
The Shark Rechargeable Floor Sweeper emerges as the superior choice for most users due to its combination of lower price, quiet operation, and washable filter system that delivers long-term value. The $43.88 price point provides immediate savings compared to the BLACK+DECKER's $54.99, while the washable filter system eliminates ongoing maintenance expenses that accumulate over years of ownership. The Shark's 75 dB quiet operation enables cleaning at any time without disturbing others, a practical advantage in shared living spaces and noise-sensitive environments. The documented effectiveness on pet hair makes the Shark particularly valuable for households with dogs or cats that shed regularly.
The Shark's 20-minute runtime is the primary limitation, requiring strategic planning for larger homes and multiple charging cycles for comprehensive cleaning sessions. However, for apartment dwellers, smaller homes, and users who prefer quick cleaning sessions throughout the day, the 20-minute runtime is adequate and even preferable. The edge-cleaning design provides ergonomic advantages when cleaning along baseboards and corners, reducing awkward bending and stretching. The higher 7.8/10 customer rating compared to the BLACK+DECKER's 7.5/10 suggests slightly higher user satisfaction and reliability.
The BLACK+DECKER Carpet Sweeper 50 Minute Lithium remains an excellent choice for users with larger homes exceeding 2,000 square feet who prioritize extended runtime over all other factors. The 50-minute battery life eliminates charging interruptions during comprehensive cleaning sessions, providing superior efficiency for spacious residences. Users with large homes should prioritize the BLACK+DECKER's extended runtime despite the higher price, as the convenience of uninterrupted cleaning justifies the premium. The quick charging capability ensures rapid battery replenishment when recharging is necessary.
For most users in typical-sized homes and apartments, the Shark's lower price, quiet operation, and long-term filter savings make it the financially and practically superior choice. Pet owners will particularly appreciate the Shark's effectiveness on pet hair, while allergy sufferers will benefit from the washable filter system that maintains consistent air quality. Budget-conscious shoppers should confidently choose the Shark without concern about the shorter runtime, as the financial advantages substantially outweigh the runtime limitations for most households.
Users with large homes exceeding 2,500 square feet who demand uninterrupted cleaning sessions should choose the BLACK+DECKER despite its higher price. The extended runtime eliminates the frustration and inefficiency of multiple charging cycles during comprehensive home cleaning. For this specific user segment, the BLACK+DECKER's premium pricing is justified and represents appropriate value for their unique requirements. However, for the broader market of apartment dwellers, small home owners, and users prioritizing affordability, the Shark Rechargeable Floor Sweeper is the clear winner and best overall recommendation.
