Two handheld vacuums compete for portability supremacy. The Shark WV201 offers smart features and wet/dry capability at $279.99. The BLACK+DECKER Dustbuster AdvancedClean+ delivers lightweight convenience at just $139.99. Which deserves your money?
| Specification | Shark WV201 WANDVAC Handheld Vacuum | BLACK+DECKER Dustbuster AdvancedClean+🏆 Winner 🏆 |
|---|---|---|
| Bin Capacity | 0.8 L | 0.35 L |
| Noise Level | 70 dB | — |
| Weight | — | 3.5 lbs |
| Self Emptying | Yes | No |
| Battery Life Min | 90 | 20 |
| Charging Time Min | 150 | 240 |
| Mopping | Yes | No |
| Scheduling | Yes | No |
| App Control | Yes | No |
| Hepa Filter | No | No |
| Wifi Connected | No | No |
| Anti Tangle Brush | No | No |
BLACK+DECKER Dustbuster AdvancedClean+
Our top pick for this comparison
The Shark WV201 WANDVAC and BLACK+DECKER Dustbuster AdvancedClean+ represent two distinct philosophies in handheld vacuum design. The Shark positions itself as a premium, feature-rich solution with smart home integration and wet/dry capability, commanding a $279.99 price point with a 9.2/10 customer rating. The BLACK+DECKER Dustbuster AdvancedClean+ takes the budget-conscious approach, offering lightweight portability and proven cyclonic suction technology at just $139.99 with an 8.4/10 rating.
These products target different user demographics and cleaning priorities. The Shark WV201 appeals to tech-savvy homeowners who value convenience features, voice control, and the ability to handle both wet and dry cleaning tasks in one device. The Dustbuster AdvancedClean+ attracts practical buyers who prioritize affordability, lightweight design, and reliable performance without unnecessary complexity or smart features. Understanding these fundamental differences is crucial when deciding which handheld vacuum best suits your household needs and lifestyle.
The price differential of $140 represents a significant investment consideration. With the Shark costing roughly double the Dustbuster, buyers must evaluate whether the additional features justify the premium. The Shark's app control, Alexa voice integration, and wet/dry mopping capability add substantial value for some users, while others may find the Dustbuster's simplicity and lower cost more appealing. Both vacuums excel in their respective categories, but they serve distinctly different market segments.
The Shark WV201 WANDVAC demonstrates exceptional performance on hard floors, where its wet and dry mopping capability provides a competitive advantage over traditional handheld vacuums. Users report that the Shark effectively removes both dry debris and moisture, making it ideal for kitchens, bathrooms, and entryways where spills are common. The device's effectiveness on hard surfaces is particularly noteworthy, as many handheld vacuums struggle with wet cleaning. The Shark's dual functionality means you're essentially getting two appliances in one, which significantly enhances its practical value for multi-surface homes.
The BLACK+DECKER Dustbuster AdvancedClean+ excels with its cyclonic suction technology, which maintains consistent power throughout the cleaning cycle. This technology proves particularly effective on stairs and furniture, where the Dustbuster's lightweight design allows for easier maneuvering. The device performs admirably on multiple surface types, from hardwood to carpet, though it requires more passes on heavily soiled areas compared to the Shark. Pet hair removal is a noted strength, with the cyclonic action effectively capturing and containing pet debris without clogging.
In terms of raw cleaning power, the Shark's basic suction capability is somewhat limited compared to the Dustbuster's cyclonic technology. However, the Shark compensates by offering specialized wet cleaning that the Dustbuster cannot match. For households with mostly hard floors and frequent spills, the Shark's wet/dry capability translates to superior real-world performance. For homes with significant carpeting and pet hair challenges, the Dustbuster's proven cyclonic suction may deliver more satisfactory results.
The winner for cleaning power depends entirely on your home's specific needs. If your primary concern is hard floor maintenance with occasional wet spills, the Shark WV201 emerges victorious. If you need reliable, consistent suction across multiple surface types with emphasis on pet hair removal, the Dustbuster AdvancedClean+ performs better. Neither device offers the suction power of full-sized upright vacuums, but both excel within their handheld category when matched to appropriate surfaces.
The BLACK+DECKER Dustbuster AdvancedClean+ specifies a 20-minute runtime, which represents a significant limitation for larger homes or extended cleaning sessions. This battery life requires strategic planning—you'll need to prioritize which areas to clean first and may need to recharge mid-session for whole-home cleaning. However, for apartment dwellers, small homes, and quick spot-cleaning tasks, 20 minutes often proves sufficient. The fade-free lithium-ion battery technology ensures consistent performance throughout the charge cycle, meaning you won't experience diminishing suction as the battery depletes.
The Shark WV201's battery specifications are not provided in the available data, creating uncertainty about its practical runtime. This omission is notable, as battery life is a critical factor in handheld vacuum selection. Without specific runtime information, potential buyers cannot accurately assess whether the Shark suits their home size and cleaning patterns. This lack of transparency is a disadvantage compared to the Dustbuster's clearly stated 20-minute runtime, even though the Shark's rating suggests users find the battery performance acceptable.
For practical home cleaning scenarios, battery runtime significantly impacts device utility. A 20-minute battery works well for targeted cleaning—spot-cleaning spills, cleaning stairs, or tidying furniture. For comprehensive home cleaning, you'll need to plan around charging cycles or accept that the device isn't designed as a primary vacuum solution. The Shark's unspecified runtime could range from similar (20 minutes) to significantly longer, making direct comparison impossible without additional information.
Based on available specifications, the Dustbuster's transparent 20-minute runtime is better for setting realistic expectations, while the Shark's undisclosed battery life remains a question mark. For apartment dwellers and those seeking a supplementary vacuum for quick tasks, either device works within its runtime limitations. For larger homes requiring extended cleaning sessions, neither handheld option serves as a complete replacement for a full-sized upright vacuum, though the Shark's missing specification suggests it may offer longer runtime.
The BLACK+DECKER Dustbuster AdvancedClean+ excels in portability with its documented 3.5-pound weight, making it exceptionally light and easy to handle for extended periods. This lightweight design proves invaluable for cleaning stairs, reaching ceiling corners, and maneuvering around furniture without arm fatigue. The compact form factor allows for easy storage in closets, under sinks, or mounted on walls, making the Dustbuster an excellent choice for homes with limited storage space. Users consistently praise the device's ease of use, noting that anyone in the household can comfortably operate it without strength requirements.
The Shark WV201's weight is not specified, creating difficulty in directly comparing portability. However, the device's noted simplicity to operate suggests an intuitive design that prioritizes user-friendliness. The Shark's larger size (implied by its wet/dry mopping capability and app control features) likely makes it heavier than the Dustbuster, though exact specifications would confirm this assessment. The inclusion of voice control with Alexa adds convenience for hands-free operation, particularly useful when your hands are full with other tasks.
For stair cleaning, the Dustbuster's lightweight design provides a significant advantage, allowing users to comfortably climb while vacuuming without excessive fatigue. The Shark's wet/dry capability makes it more versatile for various cleaning scenarios, but the added weight and complexity may make stair work more challenging. When switching between floor types, the Dustbuster's cordless convenience and quick maneuverability shine, while the Shark's app control allows for customization but requires additional steps.
The clear winner for portability is the BLACK+DECKER Dustbuster AdvancedClean+, with its documented 3.5-pound weight and proven lightweight design. The Shark WV201 offers better ease-of-use features through voice control and app integration, but without weight specifications, we cannot fully assess its portability advantage. For users prioritizing one-handed operation and minimal fatigue during extended cleaning sessions, the Dustbuster is the superior choice.
The Shark WV201 WANDVAC includes app control and Alexa voice integration, positioning it as a smart home-compatible device. Voice control enables hands-free operation—you can start cleaning, adjust settings, or stop the device without touching controls, which proves convenient when carrying cleaning supplies or when your hands are wet. The app control functionality allows remote monitoring and operation, though the specification notes that app features are somewhat limited. This smart integration appeals to technology enthusiasts and those invested in smart home ecosystems, adding a layer of convenience to routine cleaning tasks.
The BLACK+DECKER Dustbuster AdvancedClean+ lacks app control and smart features, maintaining a straightforward, no-frills operational approach. This simplicity has advantages—there's no learning curve, no app to download, no connectivity issues, and no dependence on internet connectivity for basic operation. For users who find smart features unnecessary or frustrating, this traditional approach feels refreshingly uncomplicated. The device works immediately out of the box without any setup or configuration required.
The practical value of the Shark's smart features depends on your lifestyle and preferences. If you're already invested in Alexa and smart home devices, voice control integration adds genuine convenience. If you rarely use smart home features, this functionality adds cost without tangible benefit. The limited app features noted in the specifications suggest that the smart integration is supplementary rather than transformative. The Dustbuster's lack of smart features means lower price, simpler operation, and fewer potential technical issues.
For tech enthusiasts and smart home users, the Shark WV201 wins decisively with its app control and voice integration. For those prioritizing simplicity, reliability, and lower cost, the Dustbuster's traditional approach proves superior. The smart features represent a lifestyle choice rather than a performance advantage—neither approach is objectively better, but they cater to different user preferences and home automation philosophies.
The Shark WV201 WANDVAC operates at 70 dB, which qualifies as relatively quiet for a vacuum cleaner. For context, normal conversation measures around 60 dB, so the Shark produces slightly more noise than human speech. This noise level is particularly important for apartment dwellers, homes with young children or sleeping family members, and those who prefer minimal disruption during cleaning. The 70 dB rating suggests the Shark prioritizes quiet operation without sacrificing suction power, making it suitable for noise-sensitive environments.
The BLACK+DECKER Dustbuster AdvancedClean+ does not provide a noise level specification, making direct comparison impossible. However, handheld vacuums typically operate quieter than upright models due to smaller motors and contained suction chambers. The Dustbuster's cyclonic technology may produce varying noise levels depending on suction intensity and surface type. Without specific decibel ratings, users cannot determine whether the Dustbuster is quieter than the Shark's documented 70 dB.
Noise considerations matter significantly in multi-family housing, shared walls, and homes with noise-sensitive occupants. The Shark's 70 dB rating positions it favorably for these scenarios, allowing cleaning without excessive disturbance to others. Early morning or late evening cleaning becomes more feasible with a quieter device. The Dustbuster's unspecified noise level creates uncertainty—it could be quieter or louder than the Shark, depending on motor design and suction chamber construction.
Based on available specifications, the Shark WV201 wins the noise category with its documented 70 dB rating, which represents acceptable quiet operation for most households. The Dustbuster's missing noise specification is a disadvantage for noise-conscious buyers. If quiet operation is a priority, the Shark's transparency about noise levels provides confidence, while the Dustbuster requires research or in-store testing to determine actual noise performance.
The Shark WV201's wet and dry mopping capability creates both advantages and maintenance considerations. The dual-tank system (one for dry debris, one for wet waste) requires separate emptying and cleaning procedures. Wet tank maintenance is particularly important—stagnant water can develop odors and mold if not properly dried after each use. The Shark's wet/dry design means more frequent maintenance compared to dry-only vacuums, as the water tank requires thorough drying and the device needs proper ventilation between uses. However, this increased maintenance is the trade-off for expanded cleaning capability.
The BLACK+DECKER Dustbuster AdvancedClean+ features a simple dry-debris collection system, making emptying straightforward and hygienic. The small dust capacity means frequent emptying for heavy-use scenarios, but the process takes seconds—simply press the release button and empty debris into a trash bin. There's no water to manage, no wet tank to dry, and no risk of mold or odors developing. The simplicity of maintenance appeals to users who want minimal fuss and maximum convenience.
Filter maintenance differs between the two models. The Shark's specifications don't detail filter requirements, but wet/dry vacuums typically require more frequent filter cleaning to prevent moisture damage and maintain suction. The Dustbuster's cyclonic technology reduces reliance on filters for suction maintenance, though periodic cleaning ensures optimal performance. Neither device specifies self-cleaning capabilities, meaning both require manual maintenance.
For sanitary considerations, the Dustbuster's dry-only operation is inherently more hygienic—there's no water to harbor bacteria or mold. The Shark's wet tank functionality requires diligent drying and cleaning protocols to prevent unhygienic conditions. Users with allergies or sensitivities should prioritize the Dustbuster's simpler, drier maintenance routine. The winner for maintenance ease is clearly the BLACK+DECKER Dustbuster AdvancedClean+, which requires minimal upkeep and poses no moisture-related concerns.
The Shark WV201 specifications do not detail included accessories, creating uncertainty about what's included in the box. Typical handheld vacuum packages might include floor nozzles, upholstery attachments, crevice tools, and cleaning solution for wet mopping. The absence of accessory information suggests either limited inclusions or incomplete product specifications. This omission makes it difficult to assess total value—the $279.99 price point may or may not include useful attachments that expand cleaning versatility.
The BLACK+DECKER Dustbuster AdvancedClean+ similarly lacks detailed accessory specifications, though the "AdvancedClean+" designation suggests enhanced attachment options compared to basic Dustbuster models. Standard Dustbuster packages typically include various nozzles for different surfaces and crevice tools for tight spaces. The compact design limits attachment size and complexity, but focused tools for stairs, furniture, and crevices are generally included.
Accessories significantly impact practical value and cleaning versatility. Comprehensive attachment packages allow single devices to handle multiple cleaning scenarios, increasing overall utility. Limited or missing accessories mean purchasing additional tools separately, adding to total ownership cost. For the Shark WV201, the wet/dry mopping capability may come with specialized cleaning pads and solution applicators, though this remains unspecified. For the Dustbuster, standard handheld attachments likely cover most household cleaning needs.
Without detailed accessory information for either device, direct comparison is impossible. The Shark's higher price point suggests more comprehensive accessories, while the Dustbuster's lower cost may mean more basic inclusions. Potential buyers should verify exact package contents before purchasing, as accessories significantly impact cleaning versatility and overall satisfaction with either device.
The BLACK+DECKER Dustbuster AdvancedClean+ at $139.99 represents exceptional value for budget-conscious buyers seeking a reliable handheld vacuum. At this price point, you're investing in proven cyclonic suction technology, lightweight portability, and fade-free lithium-ion battery technology—all essential handheld vacuum features. The Dustbuster's 8.4/10 customer rating indicates solid satisfaction despite the lower price, suggesting buyers feel they receive good value for their investment. For apartment dwellers, small homes, and supplementary cleaning needs, this price point is difficult to beat.
The Shark WV201 WANDVAC at $279.99 costs approximately $140 more than the Dustbuster, nearly double the investment. This premium pricing reflects the device's advanced features: smart home integration, Alexa voice control, app connectivity, and wet/dry mopping capability. The 9.2/10 customer rating suggests users believe the additional features justify the higher cost, though this rating may reflect early adoption enthusiasm. For the $140 price difference, you're essentially purchasing smart home integration and wet cleaning capability—whether these features justify the cost depends on your priorities and existing smart home setup.
Long-term value considerations include durability, warranty coverage, and replacement part availability. The Shark's specifications note "less durable than premium models," suggesting potential longevity concerns despite the premium price. This durability concern is significant—if the device fails after 2-3 years, the $279.99 investment becomes less attractive. The Dustbuster's proven BLACK+DECKER reputation and simpler design suggest better durability prospects, though this isn't explicitly confirmed. Neither specification provides warranty details, making long-term value assessment incomplete.
Replacement parts and battery availability affect true ownership cost. The Dustbuster's ubiquity means replacement batteries and parts are readily available at reasonable prices. The Shark's newer smart features may have limited aftermarket support, potentially making repairs more expensive or difficult. If the device requires battery replacement after warranty expiration, total cost of ownership could exceed initial purchase price significantly.
For pure value-for-money analysis, the BLACK+DECKER Dustbuster AdvancedClean+ emerges as the clear winner. You receive proven technology, lightweight design, and reliable performance for $139.99 without paying premium prices for smart features you may never use. The Shark WV201 offers superior features and higher customer satisfaction ratings, but at nearly double the price, it represents a luxury upgrade rather than a value proposition. For budget-conscious buyers, the Dustbuster delivers exceptional cleaning performance per dollar spent.
Pet owners dealing with constant hair shedding and dander will find the Dustbuster's cyclonic suction technology particularly effective at capturing and containing pet debris. The device's noted pet hair capability means it handles fur without clogging or losing suction, a critical factor for multi-pet households. The lightweight 3.5-pound design makes cleaning furniture, pet beds, and car interiors less fatiguing during the frequent sessions pet ownership demands. For quick cleanup of tracked-in dirt and shed hair between vacuuming sessions, the Dustbuster's convenience and effectiveness make it the superior choice for pet owners.
Neither handheld device serves as a primary vacuum for large homes. The Dustbuster's 20-minute runtime and limited dust capacity make it unsuitable for comprehensive large-home cleaning. The Shark's unspecified runtime and basic suction power similarly position it as supplementary rather than primary cleaning equipment. Large homes require full-sized upright or robot vacuums for efficient whole-home coverage. Both handheld models excel as supplementary devices for stairs, furniture, and spot cleaning in large homes, but neither should be a household's only vacuum.
Allergy sufferers benefit from the Dustbuster's dry-only operation, which eliminates moisture-related mold and bacteria growth that can trigger allergic reactions. The cyclonic suction effectively captures allergens without releasing them back into the air, containing dust and dander safely until emptying. The simple maintenance routine—no wet tanks to clean, no moisture to manage—reduces exposure to allergens during device upkeep. For those with dust mite allergies or sensitivities to mold spores, the Dustbuster's straightforward dry operation is significantly safer than the Shark's wet/dry system.
At $139.99, the Dustbuster AdvancedClean+ is the obvious choice for budget-conscious buyers. You receive proven technology, solid customer ratings, and reliable performance without paying premium prices for smart features. The device's simplicity means no app subscriptions, no smart home setup requirements, and no unnecessary complexity driving up cost. For those seeking maximum cleaning performance per dollar invested, the Dustbuster's value proposition is unbeatable.
Tech enthusiasts who already use Alexa and smart home devices will appreciate the Shark's voice control integration and app connectivity. The ability to start cleaning via voice command or smartphone app adds convenience that appeals to those invested in smart home ecosystems. For users who value cutting-edge features and don't mind paying premium prices for technological advancement, the Shark's smart integration justifies the $279.99 investment. The device positions itself as a smart home appliance rather than merely a cleaning tool.
Winner: BLACK+DECKER Dustbuster AdvancedClean+
The BLACK+DECKER Dustbuster AdvancedClean+ emerges as the superior overall choice for most households, despite the Shark WV201's higher customer rating and more advanced features. The Dustbuster's exceptional value proposition—combining proven cyclonic suction technology, lightweight portability, and affordable pricing—makes it the most practical choice for typical buyers. At $139.99, you receive reliable performance without paying premium prices for smart features that many users will never utilize.
The Dustbuster's clear advantages include transparent specifications (especially the 3.5-pound weight and 20-minute runtime), proven cyclonic suction technology, lightweight design ideal for stairs and furniture, fade-free lithium-ion battery, and exceptional value for money. The device delivers everything a handheld vacuum should accomplish without unnecessary complexity. For apartment dwellers, small home owners, and those seeking supplementary cleaning power, the Dustbuster provides everything needed at an unbeatable price point.
However, the Shark WV201 WANDVAC deserves recognition for specific advantages that justify its premium price for particular users. The 70 dB quiet operation appeals to noise-sensitive households, the wet and dry mopping capability provides unique functionality unavailable on the Dustbuster, and the 9.2/10 customer rating indicates genuine satisfaction with the device's performance. For tech-savvy users already invested in smart home ecosystems, the Alexa integration and app control add meaningful convenience.
The critical distinction lies in realistic expectations. The Dustbuster serves as an honest handheld vacuum—lightweight, portable, reliable, and affordable—without overpromising or adding unnecessary features. The Shark positions itself as a premium smart home device with expanded capabilities, commanding premium pricing accordingly. Neither device replaces a full-sized upright vacuum for comprehensive home cleaning; both function best as supplementary cleaning tools for stairs, furniture, and quick spot-cleaning tasks.
For most households, the BLACK+DECKER Dustbuster AdvancedClean+ represents the smarter investment. The $140 price difference between devices is substantial, and unless smart home integration and wet mopping are genuine priorities, that money is better spent on a quality full-sized vacuum or saved entirely. The Dustbuster delivers reliable, proven performance without the premium pricing or durability concerns noted for the Shark.
Choose the Shark WV201 WANDVAC if you're a tech enthusiast with an existing smart home setup, if wet and dry mopping is genuinely important for your cleaning needs, and if you value quiet operation (70 dB) enough to justify double the price. Choose the BLACK+DECKER Dustbuster AdvancedClean+ if you prioritize value, lightweight portability, and straightforward reliability. For the vast majority of buyers, the Dustbuster's combination of performance, price, and practicality makes it the clear winner.
