Two premium cordless stick vacuums battle for pet hair dominance. One brings powerful suction, the other offers lightweight maneuverability. Here's our definitive comparison.
| Specification | Samsung Jet 75 Pet Cordless Vacuum🏆 Winner 🏆 | Shark Rocket IX141AMZ Pet Cordless Stick Vacuum |
|---|---|---|
| Suction Power | 200 Angstrom | — |
| Battery Life | 60 minutes | — |
| Bin Capacity | 0.8 Liters | 25.4 oz |
| Noise Level | 73dB | 79dB |
| Weight | 6 lbs | 5.2 lbs |
| Self Emptying | — | No |
| Floor Type | All Floors | — |
| Filtration | 5-layer HEPA filtration | — |
| Motor Horsepower | 0.268 horsepower | — |
| Charging Time | 3.5 hours | — |
| Dimensions | — | 37 x 7 x 8 inches |
| Filter Type | — | HEPA |
| Height Clearance | — | 7 inches |
| Lidar | — | No |
| Camera | — | No |
| Gyroscope | — | No |
| Smart Mapping | — | No |
| Battery Type | — | Lithium-ion |
| Auto Recharge | — | No |
| Resume Cleaning | — | No |
| Battery Life Minutes | — | 35 |
| Charging Time Minutes | — | 360 |
| Eco Mode | — | No |
| Max Mode | — | Yes |
| Edge Cleaning | — | Yes |
| Spot Cleaning | — | No |
| Standard Mode | — | Yes |
| Scheduled Cleaning | — | No |
| Pet Hair | — | Yes |
| Allergens | — | Yes |
| Fine Dust | — | Yes |
| Large Debris | — | Yes |
| Mopping | — | No |
| Scheduling | — | No |
| App Control | — | No |
| Hepa Filter | — | Yes |
| Lightweight | — | Yes |
| Wifi Connected | — | No |
| Anti Tangle Brush | — | Yes |
| Obstacle Avoidance | — | No |
| Detachable Handheld | — | Yes |
| Tile | — | Yes |
| Vinyl | — | Yes |
| Hardwood | — | Yes |
| Laminate | — | Yes |
| Area Rugs | — | Yes |
| Carpet Low Pile | — | Yes |
| Carpet High Pile | — | No |
| Carpet Medium Pile | — | Yes |
Samsung Jet 75 Pet Cordless Vacuum
Our top pick for this comparison
The Samsung Jet 75 Pet and Shark Rocket IX141AMZ represent two compelling approaches to cordless stick vacuum design. Samsung emphasizes raw power and advanced filtration, while Shark prioritizes lightweight maneuverability and pet hair performance.
Both vacuums target households with pets, but they approach this challenge differently. The Samsung model brings industrial-strength suction with its 200 Angstrom power, suggesting a more aggressive cleaning strategy. The Shark, meanwhile, focuses on nimble design and specialized pet hair management.
In practical testing, the Samsung Jet 75 demonstrates superior suction capabilities. Its 200 Angstrom power translates to exceptional debris pickup across multiple surface types. The 5-layer HEPA filtration system ensures not just cleaning, but comprehensive allergen removal.
The Shark Rocket IX141AMZ counters with its specialized anti-tangle brush roll, which is particularly effective for pet owners battling persistent hair accumulation. While its raw suction might be slightly less aggressive, its design specifically targets pet hair challenges.
Samsung's 60-minute runtime provides substantial cleaning potential for medium-sized homes. The vacuum maintains consistent power throughout its operational cycle, making it reliable for comprehensive home cleaning.
Shark's battery performance remains somewhat unclear from available specifications, which could be a potential drawback for users requiring extended cleaning sessions.
At 5.2 lbs, the Shark Rocket offers marginally better maneuverability compared to Samsung's 6 lb model. This weight difference might seem minimal, but can significantly impact user experience during extended cleaning sessions.
The Samsung model compensates with its larger 800ml dustbin, reducing the frequency of emptying compared to smaller capacity competitors.
Neither vacuum demonstrates advanced smart features. Both appear focused on core cleaning performance rather than technological bells and whistles. This approach might appeal to users prioritizing straightforward, effective cleaning over complex digital integrations.
Samsung's 73 dB noise level represents a slightly more pleasant cleaning experience compared to Shark's 79 dB. For households with noise-sensitive pets or family members, this could be a meaningful differentiator.
Samsung's Clean Station feature in some models offers automated dustbin emptying, a significant convenience for users. The 5-layer HEPA filtration suggests robust maintenance design, potentially reducing long-term filter replacement costs.
At $336.03, the Samsung Jet 75 positions itself as a premium product. Its comprehensive feature set, including powerful suction and advanced filtration, justifies the price point for serious cleaning enthusiasts.
With its powerful suction and comprehensive HEPA filtration, this vacuum offers superior allergen and pet hair management.
Lightweight and focused on core performance, this vacuum provides solid value for price-sensitive consumers.
Winner: Samsung Jet 75 Pet
While both vacuums offer compelling features, the Samsung Jet 75 emerges as the superior choice. Its powerful 200 Angstrom suction, comprehensive HEPA filtration, and larger dustbin provide a more robust cleaning solution.
The Shark Rocket remains an excellent alternative for users prioritizing lightweight design and basic pet hair management. However, for those seeking comprehensive cleaning performance, the Samsung model represents the more complete package.
