Two premium cordless stick vacuums compete for household dominance. The Shark Vertex emphasizes affordability and pet hair mastery, while the Samsung Jet 75 Pet leads with lightweight design and powerful cyclone technology. Here's our detailed breakdown.
| Specification | Shark Vertex Cordless IZ462H🏆 Winner 🏆 | Samsung Jet 75 Pet Cordless Vacuum |
|---|---|---|
| Suction Power | Not specified | 200 Angstrom |
| Battery Life | 60 minutes | 60 minutes |
| Bin Capacity | 600ml | 0.8 Liters |
| Noise Level | 80dB | 73dB |
| Weight | 9.04 lbs | 6 lbs |
| Filtration | HEPA | 5-layer HEPA filtration |
| Charging Time | 3.5 hours | 3.5 hours |
| Floor Type | — | All Floors |
| Motor Horsepower | — | 0.268 horsepower |
Shark Vertex Cordless IZ462H
Our top pick for this comparison
The Shark Vertex Cordless IZ462H and Samsung Jet 75 Pet represent two distinct philosophies in the cordless vacuum market. The Shark positions itself as the value-conscious choice, delivering professional-grade cleaning capabilities at a significantly lower price point. The Samsung Jet 75 Pet, conversely, targets consumers willing to invest more for a lighter, more maneuverable cleaning experience with advanced filtration technology. Both vacuums earn identical 9.3/10 ratings, indicating strong performance in their respective categories. The Shark Vertex weighs 9.04 lbs and operates at 80dB, making it heavier and louder than its competitor. The Samsung Jet 75 Pet tips the scales at just 6 lbs and operates at a quieter 73dB. These fundamental differences shape the user experience dramatically. For households with multiple pets and budget constraints, the Shark Vertex offers exceptional value. For those prioritizing ease of use and quiet operation, the Samsung Jet 75 Pet justifies its premium pricing.
The core positioning reveals important insights about target demographics. Shark targets families and pet owners who need robust cleaning power without premium pricing. Samsung targets consumers in urban apartments and multi-story homes where weight and noise matter significantly. Both offer 60-minute runtime batteries, but the Samsung's lighter frame makes extended cleaning sessions less fatiguing. The Shark's DuoClean PowerFins HairPro technology specifically addresses pet hair challenges, while Samsung's 200AW Jet Cyclone suction and 5-layer HEPA filtration appeal to allergy sufferers. Neither vacuum offers smart mapping, Wi-Fi connectivity, or app control, placing both in the traditional cordless stick category rather than the emerging smart vacuum segment.
The Shark Vertex Cordless IZ462H delivers impressive real-world cleaning performance, particularly on pet hair and carpeted surfaces. The DuoClean PowerFins HairPro system features dual brush rolls that work in tandem to lift hair from fibers without tangling. In practical testing scenarios, the Shark excels on medium-pile carpets and effectively removes embedded pet hair that other vacuums miss. The MultiFLEX articulating wand allows cleaning under furniture without bending or contorting, accessing spaces that traditional stick vacuums cannot reach. On hardwood floors, the transition between carpet and hard surfaces feels natural, though the heavier weight requires slightly more effort during extended cleaning sessions. The LED headlights prove surprisingly useful for identifying dust and debris in shadowed areas under beds and couches.
The Samsung Jet 75 Pet delivers powerful suction through its 200AW Jet Cyclone technology, which maintains consistent suction throughout the battery cycle. This is a significant advantage over vacuums that experience suction degradation as battery power depletes. The large 800ml dustbin capacity means fewer emptying interruptions during cleaning sessions. The 5-layer HEPA filtration system captures 99.97% of particles as small as 0.3 microns, making it superior for households with allergy sufferers or respiratory sensitivities. On hardwood floors, the Samsung performs exceptionally well, picking up fine dust and debris in single passes. However, on thick carpet, some users report needing slightly more passes to achieve the same depth of cleaning that the Shark delivers with its dual brush roll system.
The winner in real-world performance depends on your primary cleaning needs. For pet owners with heavy shedding, the Shark Vertex takes the edge with its specialized pet hair technology. For allergy sufferers and those prioritizing fine particle capture, the Samsung Jet 75 Pet's superior filtration and consistent suction power provide better protection. Both vacuums perform admirably on mixed floor types, though the Shark's design philosophy better addresses pet-specific challenges while the Samsung excels at microscopic particle removal.
Both the Shark Vertex and Samsung Jet 75 Pet offer identical 60-minute runtime specifications, which proves sufficient for most household cleaning scenarios. For apartments and homes up to 2,500 square feet, a single charge handles complete cleaning without requiring battery swaps. The removable battery system on the Shark Vertex allows purchasing an additional battery pack for extended cleaning sessions, enabling back-to-back cleaning of larger homes without waiting for recharge cycles. This modular approach provides flexibility that the Samsung cannot match, though it requires additional investment. The Shark's battery system also means you can have one battery charging while using the second, eliminating downtime entirely.
The Samsung Jet 75 Pet's 60-minute runtime operates within similar practical parameters, though the lighter frame means users experience less fatigue during extended cleaning sessions. The Samsung's consistent suction maintenance throughout the battery cycle ensures that the final 10 minutes of cleaning delivers the same power as the first 10 minutes, unlike some competitors where suction degrades noticeably. For homes exceeding 3,000 square feet, both vacuums may require strategic planning, such as charging between upper and lower levels. Neither vacuum offers fast-charging capabilities, so planning cleaning sessions around battery cycles becomes necessary for larger properties.
In practical terms, the Shark Vertex's removable battery advantage becomes significant for larger homes or users with multiple pets requiring frequent cleaning. The Samsung Jet 75 Pet's lightweight design makes the 60-minute runtime feel less taxing physically, though it doesn't extend the actual cleaning duration. For average households with typical pet shedding, both runtimes prove adequate. The winner here is the Shark Vertex for those who can afford additional batteries, as it effectively doubles available cleaning time without purchasing a second vacuum.
The Samsung Jet 75 Pet's 6-pound weight represents a significant advantage in portability and user comfort. This lightweight design excels for cleaning stairs, elevated surfaces, and extended sessions where arm fatigue becomes a factor. Users with arthritis, shoulder problems, or generally reduced upper body strength will find the Samsung dramatically easier to manage. The lightweight frame also simplifies transitioning between different floor types and switching between carpet and hard surface cleaning modes. Storage becomes easier with the Samsung, as the lighter weight allows comfortable wall mounting without heavy-duty brackets.
The Shark Vertex's 9-pound weight, while heavier than the Samsung, remains manageable for most users and doesn't significantly impair stair cleaning or elevated surface work. However, extended cleaning sessions lasting 45-60 minutes may cause noticeable arm fatigue compared to the lighter Samsung. The MultiFLEX wand design on the Shark provides articulation advantages that partially offset the weight disadvantage, allowing users to reach under furniture without excessive bending or contortion. One-handed operation feels more natural on the Samsung due to its weight distribution, though the Shark remains usable with proper technique.
For multi-story homes, the Samsung Jet 75 Pet's portability becomes increasingly valuable. Carrying the vacuum up and down stairs multiple times during a cleaning session reveals the weight difference clearly. The Shark Vertex doesn't present major usability challenges but requires slightly more physical exertion. The winner for ease of use is the Samsung Jet 75 Pet, particularly for users prioritizing comfort during extended cleaning sessions or those with physical limitations.
Neither the Shark Vertex nor the Samsung Jet 75 Pet offers Wi-Fi connectivity, app control, smart mapping, or Lidar technology. Both vacuums operate as traditional cordless stick vacuums without the smart home integration that increasingly characterizes premium vacuum models. This absence of smart features means neither vacuum can be scheduled, monitored remotely, or integrated into smart home ecosystems. For consumers seeking app-controlled cleaning or voice assistant compatibility, both options fall short compared to newer smart vacuum models entering the market.
The lack of smart features actually benefits both vacuums in terms of reliability and simplicity. Without complex electronics managing navigation and scheduling, both models focus purely on cleaning performance. Users appreciate the straightforward operation without software updates, connectivity issues, or app-dependent functionality. The trade-off is that neither vacuum offers convenience features like remote start, scheduling, or integration with smart home platforms. This positioning makes both vacuums ideal for users who prefer mechanical simplicity over digital convenience.
For the purposes of this comparison, smart features represent a wash—neither competitor offers advantages in this category. Consumers prioritizing app control and smart home integration should look toward newer robot vacuum models or premium cordless stick vacuums with connected features. Both the Shark Vertex and Samsung Jet 75 Pet cater to users who value straightforward, reliable cleaning performance over technological sophistication.
The Samsung Jet 75 Pet operates at 73dB, making it noticeably quieter than the Shark Vertex's 80dB noise level. This 7-decibel difference represents a meaningful reduction in perceived noise, roughly equivalent to the difference between a vacuum cleaner and normal conversation. For households with sleeping family members, noise-sensitive pets, or apartments with thin walls, the Samsung's quieter operation provides significant advantages. Early morning or late evening cleaning sessions become less disruptive with the Samsung's quieter performance. The reduced noise also makes extended cleaning sessions more pleasant for the person operating the vacuum.
The Shark Vertex's 80dB noise level, while louder than the Samsung, remains within acceptable ranges for standard household vacuuming during normal daytime hours. The noise doesn't represent a dealbreaker for most users, though it may be noticeable in open-concept homes or apartments. The Shark's louder operation reflects its more aggressive suction power and dual brush roll system, which naturally generate more sound. For users unconcerned about noise or primarily cleaning during daytime hours, the Shark's louder operation poses no practical disadvantage.
The noise level winner is clearly the Samsung Jet 75 Pet, particularly for those living in noise-sensitive environments or homes with multiple sleeping schedules. The 7-decibel advantage translates to noticeably quieter operation that compounds over extended cleaning sessions. For apartment dwellers and those with noise-sensitive family members, the Samsung's quieter performance justifies its premium pricing.
The Samsung Jet 75 Pet features a large 800ml dustbin capacity, which significantly exceeds typical cordless vacuum standards. This larger capacity means fewer emptying interruptions during cleaning sessions, particularly valuable for households with multiple pets or high dust production. The larger bin reduces the frequency of contact with collected debris, minimizing dust clouds when emptying. Some Samsung Jet 75 Pet models include a Clean Station for auto-emptying, though this feature varies by specific model configuration. The 5-layer HEPA filtration requires regular maintenance but provides superior particle capture compared to standard filters.
The Shark Vertex's bin capacity isn't explicitly specified, but typical Shark Vertex models feature standard-sized bins requiring more frequent emptying than the Samsung. The DuoClean PowerFins system requires regular cleaning to prevent hair tangling, particularly in households with shedding pets. The dual brush rolls necessitate more maintenance attention than single-brush designs, though the improved cleaning performance justifies this additional care. Filter maintenance remains straightforward, with washable filters reducing long-term replacement costs.
For pet owners, the Samsung's larger bin capacity provides practical advantages, reducing the frequency of emptying and associated dust exposure. The Shark requires more frequent maintenance of its brush rolls due to pet hair interaction, though this represents normal care for pet-specific vacuums. The winner for maintenance and bin capacity is the Samsung Jet 75 Pet, offering larger capacity and requiring less frequent emptying interruptions.
The Shark Vertex includes LED headlights that illuminate dark spaces under furniture, a valuable accessory for identifying hidden dust and debris. The MultiFLEX wand represents a significant included feature, providing articulation that enables under-furniture cleaning without bending. The removable battery system functions as both a practical feature and an accessory advantage, allowing users to purchase additional batteries separately. The included brush attachments and crevice tools provide standard cleaning versatility. The comprehensive accessory package reflects Shark's philosophy of delivering maximum value at the price point.
The Samsung Jet 75 Pet includes standard attachments and brush tools, though specific included accessories vary by model configuration. Some configurations include the Clean Station auto-emptying feature, representing a significant value addition. The 5-layer HEPA filtration system qualifies as a premium included feature, providing allergy protection without additional purchases. The large dustbin itself functions as a practical accessory advantage, reducing the need for frequent emptying during cleaning sessions.
Both vacuums provide solid accessory packages appropriate to their price points. The Shark Vertex's LED headlights and MultiFLEX wand represent thoughtful additions, while the Samsung's optional Clean Station and superior filtration provide different value propositions. The winner depends on priorities—the Shark excels for pet owners valuing articulation and visibility, while the Samsung serves allergy sufferers prioritizing filtration.
The Shark Vertex Cordless IZ462H retails at $249.99, representing exceptional value in the cordless stick vacuum category. This price point positions the Shark as an accessible option for budget-conscious consumers seeking professional-grade cleaning performance. Compared to Dyson cordless models costing $400-$700, the Shark delivers comparable suction power and pet hair technology at a fraction of the cost. The removable battery system, while requiring additional investment for extra batteries, provides long-term flexibility that justifies the initial purchase. For households with multiple pets or high cleaning demands, the Shark's combination of power, pet-specific features, and affordability creates exceptional value. The 9.3/10 rating indicates consumer satisfaction justifying the lower price point.
The Samsung Jet 75 Pet retails at $336.03, positioning it as a mid-range option above the Shark but significantly below premium Dyson models. This price premium of approximately $86 over the Shark reflects the lighter weight, quieter operation, larger bin capacity, and superior filtration system. For consumers prioritizing comfort during extended cleaning sessions and allergy protection, the Samsung's additional cost provides measurable benefits. The consistent suction maintenance and 200AW power delivery represent engineering advantages justifying the premium pricing. The optional Clean Station auto-emptying feature, available on some configurations, adds additional value for those seeking convenience.
Long-term value analysis favors the Shark Vertex for budget-conscious consumers and pet owners seeking maximum cleaning power per dollar. The removable battery system enables extended cleaning capability without purchasing a second vacuum. The Shark's durability and straightforward mechanics suggest reliable long-term performance without complex electronics requiring repair. The Samsung Jet 75 Pet represents better long-term value for those prioritizing comfort, allergy protection, and quiet operation, as these benefits compound over years of regular use. Neither vacuum specifies warranty terms, though both manufacturers typically offer 2-3 year coverage.
For cost-conscious households, the Shark Vertex delivers superior value, offering pet-specific cleaning power at an accessible price. For those with disposable income prioritizing comfort and health benefits, the Samsung's premium pricing provides tangible improvements in user experience and allergen control. The winner in pure value is the Shark Vertex, though the Samsung justifies its premium for specific use cases.
The Shark Vertex emerges as the superior choice for households with shedding pets, particularly those with multiple animals or heavy shedding breeds. The DuoClean PowerFins HairPro system specifically targets pet hair challenges, featuring dual brush rolls that lift hair from carpet fibers without tangling. This specialized design prevents the common problem of hair wrapping around brush rolls that plague standard vacuums in multi-pet households. The powerful suction combined with pet-specific brush technology delivers superior hair removal compared to the Samsung's more generalized approach. For pet owners on budgets, the Shark's $249.99 price point makes professional-grade pet cleaning accessible without premium pricing.
The removable battery system particularly benefits pet owners who may need extended cleaning sessions during shedding seasons. Purchasing an additional battery enables back-to-back cleaning without downtime, crucial for managing heavy pet hair accumulation. The LED headlights help identify pet hair in shadowed areas where pets frequently rest, ensuring thorough cleaning of favorite lounging spots. The Shark Vertex's proven performance in pet hair removal, combined with its affordability, makes it the clear winner for pet-focused households.
The Shark Vertex's removable battery system provides significant advantages for larger homes exceeding 2,500 square feet. By purchasing an additional battery pack, users effectively double their cleaning capacity without investing in a second vacuum. This modular approach enables continuous cleaning of multi-level homes without waiting for battery recharge cycles. The 60-minute runtime per battery, multiplied by two batteries, provides 120 minutes of total cleaning capability—sufficient for most residential properties. For large homes with extensive square footage, the Shark's battery flexibility outweighs the Samsung's weight advantage.
The Shark's powerful suction maintains cleaning effectiveness across large areas, though the heavier weight may cause fatigue during extended sessions. However, for homes with multiple cleaning zones, users can strategically position batteries and rotate between levels, minimizing continuous operation duration. The Shark's value pricing makes purchasing additional batteries more feasible than upgrading to multiple vacuums or investing in premium models.
The Samsung Jet 75 Pet's 5-layer HEPA filtration system captures 99.97% of particles as small as 0.3 microns, making it superior for households with allergies or respiratory sensitivities. This advanced filtration prevents allergens from being recirculated into living spaces, providing measurable health benefits for allergy sufferers. The larger 800ml dustbin reduces contact with collected debris, minimizing dust clouds when emptying—a significant advantage for those with allergic reactions to dust exposure. The consistent suction power throughout the battery cycle ensures that filtration effectiveness remains constant, unlike vacuums experiencing suction degradation.
For households where allergy management represents a health priority, the Samsung's superior filtration justifies its premium pricing. The combination of HEPA filtration, larger bin capacity, and consistent suction creates a comprehensive allergy management solution that the Shark cannot match.
The Shark Vertex's $249.99 price point makes it the clear winner for budget-conscious consumers seeking cordless stick vacuum performance. This price represents approximately 26% savings compared to the Samsung Jet 75 Pet while delivering comparable suction power and runtime. For households prioritizing affordability over premium features, the Shark delivers professional-grade cleaning capability at an accessible price. The straightforward mechanics and proven reliability suggest long-term durability without expensive repairs. The removable battery system, while requiring additional investment, costs significantly less than purchasing a second vacuum.
Budget-conscious users benefit from the Shark's value-oriented design philosophy, which prioritizes cleaning performance over premium materials and features. The 9.3/10 rating indicates that consumer satisfaction doesn't require premium pricing, making the Shark an intelligent financial choice for cost-aware households.
The Samsung Jet 75 Pet's 6-pound weight represents a transformative advantage for users prioritizing comfort during extended cleaning sessions. This lightweight design reduces arm fatigue, making the vacuum accessible for users with physical limitations, arthritis, or reduced upper body strength. The quieter 73dB operation creates a more pleasant cleaning experience, particularly important for those cleaning frequently or during sensitive time windows. The combination of lightweight design and quiet operation makes extended cleaning sessions significantly more comfortable than heavier, louder alternatives.
For users who value comfort and ease of use, the Samsung's premium pricing provides tangible quality-of-life improvements that justify the additional investment. The lighter weight compounds benefits over years of regular use, making the Samsung a wise choice for comfort-conscious consumers.
Winner: Shark Vertex Cordless IZ462H
The Shark Vertex Cordless IZ462H emerges as the superior choice for most households, combining exceptional cleaning power, pet-specific features, and remarkable affordability. The DuoClean PowerFins HairPro system delivers superior pet hair removal that directly addresses the primary cleaning challenge in most American households. The removable battery system provides flexibility that the Samsung cannot match, effectively doubling cleaning capacity through affordable battery purchases. At $249.99, the Shark represents exceptional value compared to premium alternatives costing $400-$700, making professional-grade cleaning accessible to budget-conscious consumers.
The Shark's 9.3/10 rating validates its performance across diverse household types and cleaning scenarios. The LED headlights and MultiFLEX wand demonstrate thoughtful design that addresses real-world cleaning challenges. The powerful suction, combined with pet-specific brush technology, delivers superior cleaning results on carpets where pet hair accumulation represents the primary concern. For households with pets, the Shark's specialized design provides measurable cleaning advantages that the Samsung's more generalized approach cannot match.
However, the Samsung Jet 75 Pet deserves consideration for specific use cases where the Shark falls short. The Samsung's 6-pound weight creates a dramatically different user experience for those with physical limitations, those cleaning multiple stories regularly, or those prioritizing comfort during extended sessions. The 73dB noise level makes the Samsung significantly quieter, benefiting apartment dwellers and households with noise-sensitive members. The 5-layer HEPA filtration and 200AW consistent suction power provide superior allergy protection that health-conscious consumers should prioritize.
The Samsung's larger 800ml dustbin and optional Clean Station auto-emptying feature represent practical advantages for those seeking convenience and reduced maintenance interruptions. For allergy sufferers, the Samsung's superior filtration justifies its premium pricing, as health benefits compound over years of regular use. The consistent suction maintenance throughout battery cycles ensures that the final minutes of cleaning deliver the same power as the first minutes, unlike competitors experiencing suction degradation.
The final recommendation depends on household priorities. Choose the Shark Vertex if you have pets, prioritize affordability, or need extended cleaning capability through multiple batteries. The pet-specific features and removable battery system provide advantages that justify the lower price point. Choose the Samsung Jet 75 Pet if you prioritize comfort, quiet operation, allergy protection, or live in a noise-sensitive environment. The lightweight design, superior filtration, and quieter operation provide quality-of-life improvements that justify the premium pricing. Both vacuums deliver 9.3/10 performance ratings, indicating that either choice provides excellent cleaning results—the decision ultimately reflects personal priorities regarding budget, comfort, pet care, and health considerations.
Two handheld vacuums compete for portability supremacy. The Shark WV201 offers smart features...
