Bissell CleanView Swivel Pet vs Eureka PowerSpeed Turbo
Two budget-friendly upright vacuums battle for supremacy in the affordable home cleaning market. Which offers the best performance and value for budget-conscious consumers?
Two budget-friendly upright vacuums battle for supremacy in the affordable home cleaning market. Which offers the best performance and value for budget-conscious consumers?

| Specification | Bissell CleanView Swivel Pet๐ Winner ๐ | Eureka PowerSpeed Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Suction Power | 1 horsepower | 960W |
| Bin Capacity | 1 liter | 2.6 Liters |
| Noise Level | 80dB | 88dB |
| Weight | 12.5 lbs | 10 lbs |
| Filtration | Multi-Level Filtration | Washable filter |
| Cleaning Path | 13.5 inches | 12.6 inches |
| Cord Length | 27 feet | 25 feet |
Bissell CleanView Swivel Pet
Our top pick for this comparison
The Bissell CleanView Swivel Pet and Eureka PowerSpeed Turbo represent two compelling budget vacuum options targeting cost-conscious homeowners seeking reliable cleaning performance. While both models occupy the affordable upright vacuum segment, they differentiate themselves through unique strengths and design philosophies.
The Bissell offers slightly more robust construction and marginally better suction, while the Eureka provides a more lightweight and extremely budget-friendly alternative. These vacuums demonstrate that effective home cleaning doesn't always require premium pricing.
In practical cleaning scenarios, the Bissell CleanView demonstrates superior performance, particularly with its Triple Action Brush Roll designed specifically for pet hair management. The 1 horsepower motor provides consistent suction across multiple surface types, making it particularly effective on carpets and hard floors with embedded debris.
The Eureka PowerSpeed, while less powerful, compensates with versatility. Its 5-height adjustment feature allows users to optimize cleaning performance across different floor types, from low-pile carpets to hardwood surfaces. This adaptability makes it a surprisingly competent performer despite its lower price point.
Portability becomes a key differentiator between these models. The Eureka's 10-pound design makes it significantly more maneuverable, ideal for users with multi-level homes or those who struggle with heavier appliances. Its lightweight construction doesn't compromise cleaning effectiveness, a notable achievement at this price range.
The Bissell, while slightly heavier at 12.5 pounds, incorporates swivel steering technology that enhances maneuverability. This design allows easier navigation around furniture and tight spaces, partially mitigating its additional weight.
Price remains the most compelling aspect of both vacuums. The Eureka PowerSpeed represents an extraordinary value proposition at just $78, making it accessible to virtually any budget. Its basic but functional design ensures users get reliable cleaning performance without significant financial investment.
The Bissell, priced at $139.99, offers marginally more advanced features. The additional cost brings improved pet hair management, a larger 1-liter dust capacity, and slightly more robust construction. For households with pets or those requiring more intensive cleaning, this represents a worthwhile investment.
The specialized Triple Action Brush Roll and larger dust capacity make this the superior choice for pet owners dealing with frequent hair and debris.
Its sub-$80 price point makes it ideal for students, first-time homeowners, or those seeking a no-frills cleaning solution.
The more powerful motor and wider 13.5-inch cleaning path provide more comprehensive cleaning across different surface types.
Winner: Bissell CleanView Swivel Pet
While both vacuums offer impressive value, the Bissell CleanView edges out as the superior choice. Its slightly higher price is justified by better pet hair management, more consistent suction, and a more robust overall design. The Eureka remains an excellent budget alternative, particularly for users with minimal cleaning requirements or tight financial constraints.