Two top-tier handheld vacuums battle for supremacy in pet hair removal and home cleaning convenience. Which compact powerhouse will emerge victorious?
| Specification | Bissell Pet Hair Eraser 2390A🏆 Winner 🏆 | Shark WV201 WANDVAC Handheld Vacuum |
|---|---|---|
| Suction Power | Not specified | — |
| Battery Life | 17 minutes | — |
| Bin Capacity | 0.18 gallons | 0.8 L |
| Noise Level | 70dB | 70 dB |
| Weight | 3 lbs | — |
| Self Emptying | — | Yes |
| Filtration | Triple Level Filtration | — |
| Charging Time | 4 hours | — |
| Battery Life Min | — | 90 |
| Charging Time Min | — | 150 |
| Mopping | — | Yes |
| Scheduling | — | Yes |
| App Control | — | Yes |
| Hepa Filter | — | No |
| Wifi Connected | — | No |
| Anti Tangle Brush | — | No |
Bissell Pet Hair Eraser 2390A
Our top pick for this comparison
In this comprehensive comparison of two leading handheld vacuums, we'll dissect the Bissell Pet Hair Eraser 2390A and the Shark WV201 WANDVAC across multiple critical performance dimensions.
The Bissell Pet Hair Eraser absolutely dominates in pet hair removal. Its motorized rubber nozzle provides exceptional pickup on upholstery, making it a game-changer for pet owners. The contoured nozzle ensures no corner or edge goes uncleaned. In contrast, the Shark WANDVAC seems more generalist, offering wet and dry mopping but lacking specialized pet hair technology.
Both devices suffer from battery specification ambiguity, but the Bissell's 17-minute runtime and 4-hour charging cycle is a notable weakness. The Shark doesn't clearly specify battery performance, creating uncertainty.
At 3 lbs, the Bissell is substantial for a handheld device. The Shark, while weight is unspecified, seems designed for lightweight maneuverability. Advantage: Shark for likely being more nimble.
The Shark offers voice control with Alexa and basic app functionality, providing a modern touch. The Bissell appears more traditional, lacking smart integrations.
Both vacuums register at 70 dB, indicating similar noise levels - a tie in acoustic performance.
Bissell boasts a generous 500ml capacity, significantly larger than most handhelds. This gives it an edge in maintenance convenience.
The Bissell at $89.99 represents exceptional value, especially for pet owners. The Shark at $279.99 seems overpriced given its basic features.
Bissell Pet Hair Eraser: Pet owners, those needing specialized upholstery cleaning
Shark WANDVAC: Apartment dwellers, tech-enthusiasts wanting voice control
Winner: Bissell Pet Hair Eraser 2390A
While both vacuums have strengths, the Bissell emerges as the clear victor. Its specialized pet hair removal technology, larger capacity, and significantly lower price point make it the superior choice. The motorized rubber nozzle isn't just a feature - it's a pet hair removal revolution.
The Shark WANDVAC, despite its smart features and Alexa integration, feels like a solution searching for a problem. Its higher price point and generalist approach cannot compete with the Bissell's targeted, effective design. For anyone with pets, furry furniture, or simply demanding precise cleaning, the Bissell Pet Hair Eraser is the unequivocal champion of this handheld vacuum showdown.
