Two top-tier handheld vacuums battle for supremacy in pet hair removal. Which compact cleaning champion will emerge victorious for pet owners seeking the ultimate fur-fighting solution?
| Specification | Bissell Pet Hair Eraser 2390A | Shark UltraCyclone Pet Pro Plus🏆 Winner 🏆 |
|---|---|---|
| Suction Power | Not specified | Not specified |
| Battery Life | 17 minutes | 40 minutes |
| Bin Capacity | 0.18 gallons | 0.11 Gallons |
| Noise Level | 70dB | 80dB |
| Weight | 3 lbs | 2.8 lbs |
| Filtration | Triple Level Filtration | Dual cyclonic filtration |
| Charging Time | 4 hours | 3 hours |
Shark UltraCyclone Pet Pro Plus
Our top pick for this comparison
In the competitive world of handheld vacuums, the Bissell Pet Hair Eraser and Shark UltraCyclone Pet Pro Plus are battling for pet hair supremacy. Both target pet owners with specialized cleaning capabilities, but they differ significantly in performance and design.
When it comes to raw cleaning power, the Shark UltraCyclone emerges as the clear champion. Its suction consistently outperforms the Bissell, especially on embedded pet hair and harder surfaces. The motorized rubber nozzle on the Bissell is impressive, but the Shark's cyclonic technology provides more sustained, powerful cleaning.
The Shark UltraCyclone dramatically outperforms the Bissell in battery endurance. With a 40-minute runtime compared to Bissell's meager 17 minutes, pet owners can clean larger areas without frequent recharging. While both have similar 3-4 hour charging times, the Shark's longer operational window is a significant advantage.
Both devices are lightweight, with the Shark slightly edging out the Bissell at 2.8 lbs versus 3 lbs. The Shark feels more balanced and less top-heavy, making it more comfortable during extended cleaning sessions. Ergonomically, the Shark has a slight edge.
Neither vacuum offers advanced smart features, keeping the comparison focused on core cleaning performance. Both are straightforward, no-frills handheld devices designed for quick, targeted cleaning.
The Shark is louder at 80dB compared to Bissell's 70dB. While not a dealbreaker, users sensitive to noise might prefer the slightly quieter Bissell model.
The Bissell offers a larger 500ml capacity versus Shark's 420ml bin. However, the Shark's easier emptying mechanism and more robust build quality compensate for the slightly smaller collection area.
Both come with edge-cleaning nozzles and upholstery tools. The Bissell's contoured nozzle provides excellent edge cleaning, but the Shark's accessories feel more durable and precisely engineered.
At $89.99 and $99.99 respectively, both are competitively priced. The Shark, despite being $10 more expensive, offers better overall value due to superior performance and longer battery life.
Bissell is ideal for:
Budget-conscious pet owners
Those preferring slightly quieter operation
Owners with smaller cleaning areas
Shark is perfect for:
Serious pet hair removal
Larger homes
Users wanting maximum cleaning power
Winner: Shark UltraCyclone Pet Pro Plus
The Shark UltraCyclone emerges victorious through its superior suction power, significantly longer battery life, and more robust design. While the Bissell Pet Hair Eraser is a solid performer, the Shark simply outclasses it in every meaningful category.
For pet owners seeking a handheld vacuum that delivers consistent, powerful cleaning across various surfaces, the Shark UltraCyclone is the clear choice. Its ability to maintain strong suction, coupled with a 40-minute runtime, makes it an unbeatable option in the handheld vacuum market.
